Application · Cities & roads

A city is not one lighting network. It is four problems.

Main roads that are over-lit for most of the night, residential streets nobody can see the state of, cabinets that only speak through the bill, and a list of services waiting for an infrastructure that never arrives.

A multi-lane main road with LED street lighting

Main road in a municipal network — installed site

Four problems, one network.

They can be taken one at a time. The order below is the one that usually pays for the next step.

Step 01

The main roads

A few kilometres carry most of the consumption and most of the traffic variation. This is where adaptive operation returns 48 to 51 % beyond the LED.

Adaptive lighting →
Step 02

The rest of the network

Residential streets need visibility more than dimming: energy per luminaire, faults before the phone call, and profiles that respect the class.

Lighting control →
Step 03

The cabinets

Certified metering per line, alarms on protections and doors, switching with local override — including on the stretches that are not connected yet.

Cabinet control →
Step 04

The services

Air quality, noise, traffic counts, water levels, parking. Adding one is adding a sensor to a network that is already there.

City services →
Be honest about the mix

Not every street deserves an adaptive system.

On a class M5 residential road the design class is already low, and the measured saving falls to around a quarter. On a main road it is around a half. Any supplier who quotes you one percentage for the whole city has not looked at the city.

What we do instead: take the class of each stretch, the length and the traffic profile, and say which kilometres justify sensors and which only need control. Then the business case is built on the mix, not on the best case.

See a measured case →
Measured energy reduction, beyond the same LEDs on an astronomical clock
Main road, Italy · 16 months−51 %
Main road, Vietnam · 878 luminaires−48 %
Residential M4/M5 · 2,957 luminaires−24.6 %

Pasolini et al., Sensors 24(18):5942, 2024 — study with the University of Bologna and CNIT, Wi4B researchers among the authors.

For the people who run it

What changes on Monday morning.

The energy figure convinces the committee. These are the things that convince the maintenance team.

The morning list

Failed drivers, isolated luminaires and tripped protections arrive as a list, with positions — instead of as reports from residents.

Proof for the inspection

Every reduction stored with the measurement that justified it, and a report that leaves as PDF or Excel.

No bill per lamp

The mesh belongs to the city: no SIM and no subscription attached to each luminaire for the next fifteen years.

How a city usually starts.

References available on request
01One stretch, one gateway

A pilot of a kilometre or two with its own sensors, measured against its own history. Enough to settle the argument with data from your own road.

02The main roads

Extension to the stretches where the class and the traffic justify sensors, usually funded by what the pilot demonstrated.

03The whole network

Control everywhere, cabinets included, and the first city service on the network that is now in every street.

Send us your lighting inventory.

Stretches, classes, number of luminaires and cabinets — even a rough list. We will come back with what is worth doing first and what it would save.

Talk to an engineer